| Main Subject |
Hubs | Hubbers | Topics | Request |
| #1 in Business | Subscribe Email Print |
|
You are here: Home > Internet and Businesses Online > Ecommerce > DXInOne - Issue #1 - Why Are Our Funds Locked In The DXSystem? |
|
Main Subject - DXInOne - Issue #1 - Why Are Our Funds Locked In The DXSystem?
Locked in Funds? Ok… let me kick the opening of this series off with this all-consuming question: “Why is our money locked in the system, anyway?” I want to do that to make sure everyone starts off on the same page… please bear with me if you find this first topic to be so basic; at least I can suggest to feel good about knowing that there are numerous DXUsers who are now reading this topic, who did not really understand this issue (and w According to USFDA, a combination product is one composed of any combination of a drug and device; biological product and device; drug and biological product ill find it helps them grasp what is happening)! Being able to get past this bit of confusion is a HUGE first step towards getting back on track… To deal with that issue, let’s first realize that there are about 4 groups into which everyone falls. The four groups a) You have put money into the system via InXchanging, but have not yet ever removed any amount of money at all. You also have never had an OutXchange processed. In shor ; or drug, device, and biological product and fixed dose combination would include two or more combinations of drug. Examples of combination products may in t, you have put money in… and never seen any at all back. For those of you who have gotten DXG via P4 (DXDirect) exchanges, this applies to you as well. b) You have put money into the system, and have had OutXchanges processed. You have returned virtually all of the money you have received, via InXchanges. For those of you who have gotten DXG via P4 (DXDirect) exchanges, this applies to you as well – you have gotten OutXchanges and since InXchanged virtual lude drug-coated devices, drugs packaged with delivery devices in medical kits, and drugs and devices packaged separately but intended to be used together. ly all of that money into the system to get your Portfolios started. c) You have put money into the system, and received OutXchanges, and put some of that money back into the system, which you have since not been able to OutXchange again. You have kept the rest for your own personal use. d) You have put money into the system, and received OutXchanges which you have kept: totaling your entire principal (initial investment amounts), and per here is enormous increase in the number of combination products entering the market in the recent years. Combination products have proven advantages but fixe haps some gains which you have kept. You are currently working on profits alone, and not able to receive that money via OutXchanges. Perhaps about 5% of DXUsers system-wide fall into group (a). Perhaps about 15% of DXUsers fall into group (b). Most of the rest fall into group (d)… perhaps 60% of DXUsers fall into that group. One thing to keep in mind at this time: most of the DXCommunity has been able to OutXchange far and above their original investment over the course o d dose combinations are still in the process of convincing regulatory authority on their advantages over the single ingredient formulations. Combination pro f time. Much of that money was returned to the system AT LEAST ONCE, over the course of time. Outside of that, much of the money has simply been cashed out by various DXUsers, and spent. And now things are drastically slow. So why is that? Defining the DXSystem Let’s start by putting a definition to the section of the DXInOne System that everyone has been working. By defining it, we can better understand the cash-flow concept that led to the slow ucts have become life saving products for the pharmaceutical companies who doesn’t have many innovative molecules in their product pipeline and have been inc down we’re facing at this time. DXInOne (this mainstream section of the system) is… what? It is an ‘accruals-based exchange reserves platform.’ So, ok… what is THAT supposed to mean? Taking it apart by each term: ‘accruals-based’ = in any exchange system, the idea is to grow to handle more volume over time. For instance, you are constantly earning DXG. So, DXG ‘accrues.’ Therefore, if we wish to exchange that growing DXG into various forms of currency/ easingly used in the product life cycle management. Even the companies having product patents are trying to extend their product life cycle through the combi e-currency, then the amount of currency/e-currency we have available MUST ALSO GROW, over time. In other words, the more the DXG put into circulation, the more the [E-Gold, E-Bullion, hard cash in various forms of hard currency through banking mechanisms world-wide] also needs to be added. ‘reserves’ = the total amount of each e-currency and hard currency (USD, YEN, EURO, etc) that is available to the system to exchange that growing DXG. ‘exchang nation products and maximize the revenues. But the companies involved in this practice are overlooking that they are burdening the patients both economically e’ = the act of being able to convert from/to DXG, physically. That is, by actually having e-currency and/or hard currency to make exchanges with. And furthermore, it’s not just a matter of what is available, but rather, what you are also willing to accept. For instance, there are a great number of Chinese in the system. If they are making bank transactions into/out of DXGold, then they might actually be seeing overnight exchanges most of the time by now. But if y and physically. They need to rightly judge the benefits of the combination products and they have to even look at the risks involved when combining the produ ou are not accepting the Chinese Yuan (Renminbi), for instance, you would not be able to take part in those exchanges, and therefore would probably have no idea just HOW FAST those exchanges are moving at any given time. OK… now, let’s put these ideas above together. Whenever the system is slow, it must mean that there is more DXG in circulation than there is currency/e-currency reserves. In other words: WHILE DXG grows… the majority of users have cashed out most of the ts. Some of the combination products were well accepted by physicians while others suffered. Companies involved in development of combination products are fi reserves added by now (again, do we have any idea how well the Chinese or others are doing by comparison, via bank-to-bank? Hard to say. Could be fast or slow, depending on their own local currency reserves). So, getting back to the main question: ‘Why are our funds locked in the system?’ Let’s explore that… when someone says, ‘my funds are locked in’, are they speaking of the money that they have InXchanged? Most tend to think so… they feel that they put [E-Bullion] into ding difficulty in defining their combination products and facing various challenges from selecting a combination to marketing it. Following aspects would a the system, and that that money is simply ‘stuck’ somewhere. Many have no idea where Well, let’s put it this way: where do you think that money is? Is it really ‘stuck’ somewhere? What happened to that money? Where did it go? (Now again, I have to apologize to those of you who know this information well; you have to be bored out of your mind!! But let me assure you: I have actually asked this question of some individuals who asked me the same thing (why dd to the challenges in developing combination products: Which markets to tap where the combination products can do fairly well? Which combination prod are my funds locked/stuck in the system) and they actually DID NOT HAVE AN ANSWER TO THAT. Therefore, we do see the need to break this information down for many.) All right; let’s work on the answer: where do you THINK it went…? And sure – it’s not like I know exactly where each dollar of YOUR money is right now; I’m just illustrating something that isn’t clear enough to many. The Answer! Let’s say you InXchanged $5000. I probably received it through my cts are meaningful and rational? Which therapeutic categories to select? Which Combinations can address unmet needs of the patients? Do combin DXConsole. That is, the 5000 DXG you received was originally MY 5000 DXG, and when you made the payment in E-Bullion, I received that $5000 in my E-Bullion account. Well, perhaps I had a couple of web-hosting bills due, and therefore had to withdraw $4000 of that to cover those bills. And I might have only moved $1000 of that E-Bullion further through the system at that time. The person who received the $1000 (say, an OutXchange that I processed for $1000 E-Bullion on my tions increase the patient compliance? What would be the developing cost? How to tackle the risks encountered during combination product developmen DXConsole) – what do you think he/she did with that $1000? He/she might have had a mortgage payment due, and took that money for that mortgage payment. Yes… it’s like you think: ‘money in, money out.’ That is the essence of the business of exchanges in the first place. Obviously there is a lot more to this than that, and we will go through it piecemeal. In any case… We suddenly realize that the original question does not make sense: that is, the ‘locked in’ part. In ot t? As combination products don't fit into the traditional categories of drugs, medical devices, or biological products, the USFDA is in the process of devel her words, money is NOT ‘locked in’ at all. There just are not enough reserves to cash out what you have in DXG currently. The easiest way to understand it is that what you put in has already been withdrawn and spent. And/or absorbed in fees to DXInOne. And we will get into that in further topics. Two things to take away from this issue! 1) There are no funds ‘locked in’ the system, by and large. The closest you can get to ‘funds locked i ping new procedures for reviewing their safety, efficacy and quality. Professional from academic institutions, pharmaceutical industries, health care indust n’ would be the total amounts of currencies/e-currencies currently being received by various DXMerchants who are either still fast asleep at their time of the world, or are on vacation and not paying attention to their balances at this time, or for other reasons have not gotten to their accounts to either get the money back into play – partially or fully – or withdraw it (partially or fully) for bills, vacation, fun, etc. 2) The next is a question: ‘What a y and representatives from various regulatory agencies are working out to design the regulatory requirements for manufacture and sale of combination products bout marketing to raise new funds, to replace reserves that have been depleted?’ We will get into that in the next issue of this series. Following that, we will lead into how we can control system fluidity ourselves, with or without marketing, at any time, and why THAT is beneficial to us on the whole. Summary You might go through a STRING OF EMOTIONS as you read everything through. You will be afraid of some of what you read, and struggling to fi . As there is an increasing trend of the combination products companies manufacturing such products should be able to tackle the problems involved in the de gure out where this is all going. You might think that you want to leave the system at times, and then be suddenly aware of why you want to stay with the very next issue in this series. When all is said and done: You will probably not just want to stay, but you will be happy to see others go! And beyond that you will be ready to kill to get you hands on a DXMerchant Console. The reality-check in the meantime is that you will be unnerved, then you’ll understand everything elopment. They need to be wiser in analyzing the market trends and the regulatory requirements. Companies that provide selfless information through particip and see the point, then unnerved again, and then reassured again. It is because of this emotional roller-coaster ride to understanding where the system is headed (and what you need to realize about it) that SO MANY TRAINING PROGRAMS FAILED, and so few are left. The die-hard programs are NOT a matter of sheer faith; in our case, we were actually THERE as early as January 2004, when we HAD TO FIX THIS VERY PROBLEM IN THE FIRST PLACE. For us, this is just a repeat of history tion in industry events and feedback to regulatory authorities would be able to face the challenges and will be successful in developing combination products
HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
Related Articles:How to Make Sure Your Ideas Appeal to Everyone Making A Shareholders' Agreement-Checklist What Are The Implications And Benefits Of 'Verified By Visa' For E-Commerce Retailers?
|