Main Subject
#1 in Business Subscribe Email Print

You are here: Home > Business > Business > Redundancy - Contradictory New Rulings On Ageism May Lead to Unfair Dismissal

Tags

  • because
  • lawyers
  • number
  • unfair dismissal
  • developing combination

  • Links

  • Why to Write Term Papers
  • What Is Healthy Nutrition?
  • Pet Insurance - What To Look For
  • Main Subject - Redundancy - Contradictory New Rulings On Ageism May Lead to Unfair Dismissal

    A call today on our Redundancy Hot-Line started us thinking again about the contradictory implications of old legislation on new rulings on Ageism, due to come into force in the UK in October 2006.

    At the moment the European Equal Treatment Directive, commits the UK Government to
    According to USFDA, a combination product is one composed of any combination of a drug and device; biological product and device; drug and biological product
    introducing legislation outlawing age discrimination in employment and vocational training, by October 2006, but critics say that so far the government has been acting only in employer’s best interests.

    In July 2005, the Government published the draft regulations on age discrimina
    ; or drug, device, and biological product and fixed dose combination would include two or more combinations of drug.

    Examples of combination products may in
    tion. Whilst the regulations are subject to further consultation and some elements may therefore change, they provide a strong indicator as to how the legislation will be implemented in 1st October 2006.

    Under the draft Regulations, the Government is proposing that the qualifying
    lude drug-coated devices, drugs packaged with delivery devices in medical kits, and drugs and devices packaged separately but intended to be used together.

    lower and upper age limits for redundancy payments and the right to claim unfair dismissal is to be scrapped.

    For each complete year of continuous service between the ages of 18 and 21, employees receive half a week's pay. For each complete year of continuous service between the a
    here is enormous increase in the number of combination products entering the market in the recent years. Combination products have proven advantages but fixe
    es of 22 and 40, they receive one week's pay. For each complete year of continuous service between the ages of 41 and 65 you will receive 1? weeks' pay.

    Current rules state that once an individual reaches 64, the amount due is reduced by one-twelfth for every complete month you ar
    d dose combinations are still in the process of convincing regulatory authority on their advantages over the single ingredient formulations.

    Combination pro
    e over 64. This means that if you are 65 or over you are not entitled to any payment!

    To help you work out any payment, the UK Department of Works and Pensions kindly provide a Ready Reckoner for calculating the number of week's pay due. (For an official definition of a week's pay
    ucts have become life saving products for the pharmaceutical companies who doesn’t have many innovative molecules in their product pipeline and have been inc
    you'll need to consult Redundancy Payments.

    The level of statutory redundancy payments in the UK is already among the lowest in the EU and the level of the 'multiplier' (week's pay) is still to be determined!

    The Government is proposing that the current service-related qualifyin
    easingly used in the product life cycle management. Even the companies having product patents are trying to extend their product life cycle through the combi
    periods to make claims and the use of length of service (20 year cap) in calculating payments will remain.

    These current 'tapering down' provisions, which reduce awards in the period leading to the current upper age limit, will end, as will the use of age bands in calculating pay
    nation products and maximize the revenues. But the companies involved in this practice are overlooking that they are burdening the patients both economically
    ments.

    Whilst there is some support for the decision to maintain the length of service factor in the calculation of compensation, observers believe that the 20 year cap on length of service is unfair and arguably indirectly discriminatory.

    With regards to redundancy, the consulta
    and physically. They need to rightly judge the benefits of the combination products and they have to even look at the risks involved when combining the produ
    tion paper states that a policy objective is to encourage culture change whereby employers retain workers past retirement age “Because they recognise the continued valuable contribution that they can make, not because it is cheaper to make them redundant”. (IPD. Policy Document - A
    ts. Some of the combination products were well accepted by physicians while others suffered. Companies involved in development of combination products are fi
    e Positive clearly states that research finds no age difference in worker's effectiveness)

    However an alternative view, is that the setting of a default retirement age will encourage some employers to retire workers once they reach 65 rather than face higher redundancy costs shoul
    ding difficulty in defining their combination products and facing various challenges from selecting a combination to marketing it.

    Following aspects would a
    d this situation arise once the worker is over the default retirement age.

    Despite the assertion in the consultation document that the default retirement age is not a mandatory retirement age, it is believed by trade unions that many employers may seek to treat it as such.

    In our
    dd to the challenges in developing combination products:

    Which markets to tap where the combination products can do fairly well?
    Which combination prod
    opinion, older workers should receive 'Affirmative Payment' recognising their length of service and taking into account that a person made redundant after the age of 50 is eight times less likely to return to work than a person made redundant at a younger age (Employment and Older
    cts are meaningful and rational?
    Which therapeutic categories to select?
    Which Combinations can address unmet needs of the patients?
    Do combin
    People: Help the Aged Policy Statement 2004)

    Employment lawyers suggest that employers should now check their redundancy schemes and, as with the statutory scheme, remove any unjustifiable age-discriminatory provisions. Employers should also be careful of selecting employees for
    tions increase the patient compliance?
    What would be the developing cost?
    How to tackle the risks encountered during combination product developmen
    redundancy in a way that could be considered discriminatory. Redundancy selection based on “flexibility” or “last in, first out” could be construed as discriminatory and should be examined sooner rather than later.

    The biggest impact the legislation will have is on dismissal proc
    t?

    As combination products don't fit into the traditional categories of drugs, medical devices, or biological products, the USFDA is in the process of devel
    edures. Upper age limits for claiming redundancy or unfair dismissal is extended beyond the normal retirement age. It is advisable for the employer to set a new retirement date.

    Failure to do this will increase the risk of the employee claiming that the real reason for any future
    ping new procedures for reviewing their safety, efficacy and quality.

    Professional from academic institutions, pharmaceutical industries, health care indust
    dismissal is not retirement, but for some other reason such as 'redundancy' or 'capability.' In such a case according to Richard Butler International Lawyers, "The dismissal would be unfair, unless the statutory procedure has been followed."

    Failure to follow the proper procedure
    y and representatives from various regulatory agencies are working out to design the regulatory requirements for manufacture and sale of combination products
    n retirement could expose the employer to an unfair dismissal claim resulting in a basic and compensatory award of a maximum of ?58,400. (as of February 2006) or possibly an order for reinstatement or engagement. Potential claimants will have three months (from the date the complai
    .

    As there is an increasing trend of the combination products companies manufacturing such products should be able to tackle the problems involved in the de
    ned of took place) to being a claim in the Employment Tribunal. (County Court - six months)

    Employers should decide their position on age, audit employment policies for age bias, particularly considering for example recruitment and benefit schemes, access to training and opportuni
    elopment. They need to be wiser in analyzing the market trends and the regulatory requirements.

    Companies that provide selfless information through particip
    ties for promotion, equal opportunities and redundancy policies.

    A planned retirement procedure should be formulated and a 'duty to consider' procedure. Employers should start NOW as eradicating ageist attitudes and implementing change will take time.

    Copyright 2006 Margaret Stea


    tion in industry events and feedback to regulatory authorities would be able to face the challenges and will be successful in developing combination products

    HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
    <a href="http://www.mainsubjects.org.ua/article/3577/mainsubjects-Redundancy--Contradictory-New-Rulings-On-Ageism-May-Lead-to-Unfair-Dismissal.html">Redundancy - Contradictory New Rulings On Ageism May Lead to Unfair Dismissal</a>

    BB link (for phorums):
    [url=http://www.mainsubjects.org.ua/article/3577/mainsubjects-Redundancy--Contradictory-New-Rulings-On-Ageism-May-Lead-to-Unfair-Dismissal.html]Redundancy - Contradictory New Rulings On Ageism May Lead to Unfair Dismissal[/url]

    Related Articles:

    Shopaholics - Now Get Paid As You Shop

    Lean Manufacturing Techniques

    What's the Best Background Check Company?

    Bookmark it: del.icio.us digg.com reddit.com netvouz.com google.com yahoo.com technorati.com furl.net bloglines.com socialdust.com ma.gnolia.com newsvine.com slashdot.org simpy.com shadows.com blinklist.com