| Main Subject |
Hubs | Hubbers | Topics | Request |
| #1 in Business | Subscribe Email Print |
|
You are here: Home > Business > Management > 7 Horrible Hiring Mistakes |
|
Main Subject - 7 Horrible Hiring Mistakes
You need to hire the best employees.
You undoubtedly hired some employees who were losers. Oops! Well, let’s be more diplomatic. Let’s just say you hired some “underachievers” you would have been better According to USFDA, a combination product is one composed of any combination of a drug and device; biological product and device; drug and biological product without. Or maybe you have the curse of hiring only “average” employees – people who are average in productivity and average in producing profits. Question: Who wants to hire “average” (or “below average” ; or drug, device, and biological product and fixed dose combination would include two or more combinations of drug. Examples of combination products may in ) employees?
Answer: No one! To hire the best, you need to avoid the problems that plagued your previous hiring decisions. So, let me reveal seven horrible hiring blunders or mistakes you may have made. lude drug-coated devices, drugs packaged with delivery devices in medical kits, and drugs and devices packaged separately but intended to be used together. 1st Horrible Mistake: = Interviewers typically do a lousy job at predicting job success. This is a proven fact, verified by a lot of research. Statistically, most interviewers do about as well as flippin here is enormous increase in the number of combination products entering the market in the recent years. Combination products have proven advantages but fixe g a coin! 2nd Horrible Mistake = Reference checks fail to tell you what you really need to know. Most employers are so freaked out about giving reference checks that they tell you nothing or barely anythi d dose combinations are still in the process of convincing regulatory authority on their advantages over the single ingredient formulations. Combination pro ng useful about how an applicant performed on-the-job. Another way to
put that is most reference checks are about as non-useful as simultaneously (a) flipping a coin while (b) rubbing a rabbit’s foot!! 3r ucts have become life saving products for the pharmaceutical companies who doesn’t have many innovative molecules in their product pipeline and have been inc d Horrible Mistake: You relied on your “gut feel” or “intuition” & you were W-R-O-N-G.
Later, as you moaned about the mistake you made by hiring the wrong person, you
asked yourself, “I knew what I was fe easingly used in the product life cycle management. Even the companies having product patents are trying to extend their product life cycle through the combi eling. But, what was I thinking?” 4th Horrible Mistake: You used subjective prediction methods to make hiring decisions. For example, you relied on subjective interviews, subjective reference checks, or nation products and maximize the revenues. But the companies involved in this practice are overlooking that they are burdening the patients both economically subjective “impressions “ of the applicant. Wow! Were you ever off-base. And then you and
your company needed to pay for your incorrect hiring decisions. That is expensive, time-consuming, and frustrat and physically. They need to rightly judge the benefits of the combination products and they have to even look at the risks involved when combining the produ ing. 5th Horrible Mistake: You used NO objective AND customized prediction method. Important: Research shows pre-employment tests are the most objective method to make predictions. But, make sure you us ts. Some of the combination products were well accepted by physicians while others suffered. Companies involved in development of combination products are fi a test customized for specific jobs in your company!
If you have not used tests customized for specific jobs in your company, then you really have missed out on the most objective and customized prediction ding difficulty in defining their combination products and facing various challenges from selecting a combination to marketing it. Following aspects would a method you could use. 6th Horrible Mistake: You [stupidly] told the applicant what you were looking for!! Then, lo-&-behold, the applicant spent your entire interview telling you s/he just happens to po dd to the challenges in developing combination products: Which markets to tap where the combination products can do fairly well? Which combination prod ssess all the skills, talents and qualities you – stupidly – told the applicant you want in an employee.
For example, let’s say you – stupidly – told the applicant you need to hire an employee
who excels a cts are meaningful and rational? Which therapeutic categories to select? Which Combinations can address unmet needs of the patients? Do combin t teamwork, customer-service, and correctly handling small details. I bet I can predict what that applicant told you in the interview: The applicant told you – with a serious yet pleasant expression – that tions increase the patient compliance? What would be the developing cost? How to tackle the risks encountered during combination product developmen s/he excels at teamwork, customer-service, and correctly handling small details.
And then, when you hired the person who gave you all the answers you – stupidly – told
the applicant you want, you pay the t? As combination products don't fit into the traditional categories of drugs, medical devices, or biological products, the USFDA is in the process of devel price of having an employee who may not REALLY be
talented at teamwork, customer-service, or handling small details. You got fooled – and you have only yourself to blame. 7th Horrible Mistake: You terrib ping new procedures for reviewing their safety, efficacy and quality. Professional from academic institutions, pharmaceutical industries, health care indust ly harm any person you should not have hired.
Let’s be humanistic about it. If you hire the wrong person, the applicant also loses.
People crave to work in a job where they will do well and enjoy it. Peo y and representatives from various regulatory agencies are working out to design the regulatory requirements for manufacture and sale of combination products ple hate a job where they will perform only average or below average, and not enjoy the work. So, you actually benefit the applicant you carefully evaluated using customized, objective hiring methods. Summ . As there is an increasing trend of the combination products companies manufacturing such products should be able to tackle the problems involved in the de ary: When you hire . . .
1. high-achieving “superstar” employees, both you and your company win.
2. underachieving employees, (a) you lose and (b) your company loses. So, make sure you use customized a elopment. They need to be wiser in analyzing the market trends and the regulatory requirements. Companies that provide selfless information through particip nd objective prediction methods, like pre-employment tests, biodata and more, to make sure you hire employees who are (a) productive, (b) profitable, and (c) low turnover. Copyright 2006 Michael Mercer, Ph. tion in industry events and feedback to regulatory authorities would be able to face the challenges and will be successful in developing combination products
HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
Related Articles:Passive Residual Income vs Leverage Income Planning a Successful Outdoor Mobile Billboard Campaign
|