| Main Subject |
Hubs | Hubbers | Topics | Request |
| #1 in Business | Subscribe Email Print |
|
You are here: Home > Business > Ethics > Are all CEOs and Politicians Borderline Criminals? |
|
Main Subject - Are all CEOs and Politicians Borderline Criminals?
Many psychologists and many underachievers have often hypothesized that CEOs, Sports Stars, Famous Generals and CEOs are all very similar to criminals. In fact they all often d According to USFDA, a combination product is one composed of any combination of a drug and device; biological product and device; drug and biological product isplay very psychopathic tendencies that actual criminals do. Of course much of these traits are shared by all humans but a higher percentage and more often by this group above ; or drug, device, and biological product and fixed dose combination would include two or more combinations of drug. Examples of combination products may in , which includes criminals too. It is for this reason that that the subject came up in an online think tank when a member stated; “Although it is worth pointing out that it ha lude drug-coated devices, drugs packaged with delivery devices in medical kits, and drugs and devices packaged separately but intended to be used together. s been shown that many very successful persons and CEOs display psychopathic tendencies (not violent, just single-minded, ruthless in a non-violent way, and having the mindset here is enormous increase in the number of combination products entering the market in the recent years. Combination products have proven advantages but fixe f 'the ends justify the means', displaying an almost complete lack of empathy), which may be what you were alluding to with the genetic adaptation.” Indeed this is a well-know d dose combinations are still in the process of convincing regulatory authority on their advantages over the single ingredient formulations. Combination pro n fact as you point out and the difference in the behavior of a Politician and a Criminal is surprisingly little. Also the difference between a war hero, athlete and criminal i ucts have become life saving products for the pharmaceutical companies who doesn’t have many innovative molecules in their product pipeline and have been inc s surprisingly little, as well. Of course when corning CEOs on this issue and asking them what they think of this, they have told me; “well you do not know what I had to go thr easingly used in the product life cycle management. Even the companies having product patents are trying to extend their product life cycle through the combi u to get here” and similar comments from politicians and even superstar athletes. Which I having been all those I agree with their perspectives and understand those comments, y nation products and maximize the revenues. But the companies involved in this practice are overlooking that they are burdening the patients both economically t still find fault with the logic. Yet, being called a criminal because you run a company which provides goods and services to the masses and donating time, energies and monie and physically. They need to rightly judge the benefits of the combination products and they have to even look at the risks involved when combining the produ s back to the common good only to be called a criminal is what has prompted me to retire early. If society does not want what the CEOs are capable of delivering well then, the ts. Some of the combination products were well accepted by physicians while others suffered. Companies involved in development of combination products are fi citizens may find them selves all alone with no one doing anything. Ayn Rand Affect. Causing less abundance, higher prices and lower quality of life, as they vote for more free ding difficulty in defining their combination products and facing various challenges from selecting a combination to marketing it. Following aspects would a stuff [healthcare, social services] until the system collapses? Nevertheless if we look at the CEO and their viewpoints and the debris of public chastising they go thru or ba dd to the challenges in developing combination products: Which markets to tap where the combination products can do fairly well? Which combination prod tle scars endured one has to ask if those who throw such stones constantly at them, need to look in the mirror, as perhaps the real issues lie with them. In their own self indu cts are meaningful and rational? Which therapeutic categories to select? Which Combinations can address unmet needs of the patients? Do combin ced negative bio-feedback, busy blaming the world for everything that is perceived to be wrong in their lives. Does it simply make them feel better to call all politicians cri tions increase the patient compliance? What would be the developing cost? How to tackle the risks encountered during combination product developmen minals? Or all CEO narcissists? You see there really is something to be said about putting others down to make yourself feel good and so they do, as they complain about the doe t? As combination products don't fit into the traditional categories of drugs, medical devices, or biological products, the USFDA is in the process of devel rs and simply label them as the problem. In looking at all perspectives of this situation it seems there are strong people and weak people living in mediocrity, which I believ ping new procedures for reviewing their safety, efficacy and quality. Professional from academic institutions, pharmaceutical industries, health care indust that the “M” word could indeed be the only true evil. Additionally as I look the academia psycho-babble of all this, I say that the best saying of all is do not judge a man un y and representatives from various regulatory agencies are working out to design the regulatory requirements for manufacture and sale of combination products til you walk a mile in his shoes. And since I ran a 4-minute mile in College as track star and I know no one else can because I know the level of dedication, hard work and trai . As there is an increasing trend of the combination products companies manufacturing such products should be able to tackle the problems involved in the de ning it entails; I simply ask the peanut gallery to “shut up” that’s all. And thus I will defend anyone attacked on any side including the peanut throwers in all their sound an elopment. They need to be wiser in analyzing the market trends and the regulatory requirements. Companies that provide selfless information through particip d fury if they find themselves with a broken glass wall in their house. Perhaps a worthy consideration of thought and some coffee shop philosophy for you. Think on this in 2006 tion in industry events and feedback to regulatory authorities would be able to face the challenges and will be successful in developing combination products
HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
Related Articles:The Case For Taking Your Company Public On The Pink Sheets Starting A Business - The Three 'Ps'
|