| Main Subject |
Hubs | Hubbers | Topics | Request |
| #1 in Business | Subscribe Email Print |
|
You are here: Home > Business > Ethics > Capitalism is Not a Dirty Word |
|
Main Subject - Capitalism is Not a Dirty Word
Exxon recently reported that their annual profit for 2006 was in excess of $39 billion dollars. Notice I did not say earnings, According to USFDA, a combination product is one composed of any combination of a drug and device; biological product and device; drug and biological product I said PROFIT. When this was being announced on the evening news, the reporters interviewed several people w ; or drug, device, and biological product and fixed dose combination would include two or more combinations of drug. Examples of combination products may in o were pumping gas into their Luxury SUVs at their local Exxon station. They were all singing the same song, "It is immor lude drug-coated devices, drugs packaged with delivery devices in medical kits, and drugs and devices packaged separately but intended to be used together. al for Exxon to make that much money while we are spending over $2.00 a gallon for gasoline." Some were even suggesting t here is enormous increase in the number of combination products entering the market in the recent years. Combination products have proven advantages but fixe at the government take action to keep Exxon from making that much money. Does it make you angry to hear that kind of news? No d dose combinations are still in the process of convincing regulatory authority on their advantages over the single ingredient formulations. Combination pro me. I believe in capitalism. It is the American way. It is why this country has propelled itself to become the world leade ucts have become life saving products for the pharmaceutical companies who doesn’t have many innovative molecules in their product pipeline and have been inc r in commerce. It is why we have the highest standard of living in the world. It is why Bill Gates can go from being broke to easingly used in the product life cycle management. Even the companies having product patents are trying to extend their product life cycle through the combi the richest man in the world. It is the "American Dream." To expect our government to put restrictions on corporate nation products and maximize the revenues. But the companies involved in this practice are overlooking that they are burdening the patients both economically profits is an insult to our way of life. Besides, the report on Exxon did not explain the whole story. In order for Exxon to and physically. They need to rightly judge the benefits of the combination products and they have to even look at the risks involved when combining the produ earn $39 Billion in profits, it had to spend $338 Billion, making its profit margin a slim 10.46%, hardly anyt ts. Some of the combination products were well accepted by physicians while others suffered. Companies involved in development of combination products are fi ing to write home about. Why aren't we complaining about Citigroup who earned 24.03% margin by gouging us with credit card int ding difficulty in defining their combination products and facing various challenges from selecting a combination to marketing it. Following aspects would a erest? Or how about Pfizer and Merck, pharmaceutical companies who earned 22.82% and 19.59% margins respectively, while many o dd to the challenges in developing combination products: Which markets to tap where the combination products can do fairly well? Which combination prod the people in this country can't afford medication. No, instead we cry over Exxon's earnings, not realizing that each year we cts are meaningful and rational? Which therapeutic categories to select? Which Combinations can address unmet needs of the patients? Do combin spill more gasoline at the pumps than the Valdez did off the Alaskan coast. Exxon is no different than any other business. T tions increase the patient compliance? What would be the developing cost? How to tackle the risks encountered during combination product developmen ey sell their products at a price based upon what the market will bear in order to make money, support economic growth, and sat t? As combination products don't fit into the traditional categories of drugs, medical devices, or biological products, the USFDA is in the process of devel sfy their stakeholders. If you are unhappy with the profits of Exxon, buy your gas someplace else, stop driving around in inef ping new procedures for reviewing their safety, efficacy and quality. Professional from academic institutions, pharmaceutical industries, health care indust ficient, gas guzzling automobiles, support other forms of energy as a way to reduce our dependency on oil, car pool, use mass t y and representatives from various regulatory agencies are working out to design the regulatory requirements for manufacture and sale of combination products ansit, but stop whining when you hear reports that prove capitalism works. By the way, Microsoft earned 25.86% margin last yea . As there is an increasing trend of the combination products companies manufacturing such products should be able to tackle the problems involved in the de r and soon we will all be forced into buying their new operating system, Vista. Are you enjoying that big screen TV you have i elopment. They need to be wiser in analyzing the market trends and the regulatory requirements. Companies that provide selfless information through particip your living room? Texas Instruments earned 18.51% margin last year. Face it, Capitalism is not a dirty word. To Your Success tion in industry events and feedback to regulatory authorities would be able to face the challenges and will be successful in developing combination products
HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
Related Articles:Competing With Big Businesses: Stay A Step Ahead Of Big Competitors Payroll Utah, Unique Aspects of Utah Payroll Law and Practice Payroll Minnesota, Unique Aspects of Minnesota Payroll Law and Practice
|